|
![]() |
|
| Author |
|
|||||||
|
Thundercracker
Posts: 1769
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
argh my eyes
|
|||||||
| #20 02:20pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Nathan
Posts: 2945
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
here are obviously some excellent VB.NET programmers out there Get your pedanticism on: I meant "there are obviously some excellent programmers who use VB.NET" I think Hogfather's comment really gets to "why would a good developer choose to use VB.NET?". One reason given here is "my employer chose it", which for me just sets off alarm bells about the employer but clearly not everyone shares that opinion. Any other reasons? |
|||||||
| #21 05:02pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
mooby
Posts: 4176
Location: UK
|
which for me just sets off alarm bells about the employer there are alot of vb.net jobs going as people are upscaling from vb6 and asp classic. before you go on about how s*** vb6 is, something like 60-80% of busniess apps 10years ago where all vb6. now, before you go on about 10years is along time ago in computer industries, alot of real world clients (such as UK & US top 5 law firms) are just deploying windows xp and office 2003. other reasons... thres no difference in performance between c# and vb.net. so if an application needs to be built then theres no reason not to choose vb.net. |
|||||||
| #22 09:08pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Hogfather
Posts: 1966
Location: Cairns, Queensland
|
||||||||
| #23 09:47pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
paveway
Posts: 8141
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
there is a little box at the top of that chart above all of them that is missing
it's called 'everyone else' |
|||||||
| #24 10:04pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Raven
Posts: 2948
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
That chart is missing a few links. There's a fair C#/Java rivalary mid way up there, and you could probably extend that to being Java/C#/PHP.
I think the other problem is that there's two types of Java programmers: Ones who use enterprise frameworks like EE, Hibernate and Spring etc, and ones who deal with 'true' Java and stuff like SWT. Flex seems to be altogether omitted from that chart, and can frankly be anywhere from VB level Multimedia dropouts to Enterprise Java people. |
|||||||
| #25 10:07pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 8361
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
raven: it's not supposed to be a serious chart
|
|||||||
| #26 10:09pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Persay
Posts: 5123
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
I think raven exists in the third dimension of that chart which is perpendicular to his screen wherein he is even better than its creator
|
|||||||
| #27 10:29pm 19/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Spook
Posts: 22367
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
:(
how come my camels got nuked? |
|||||||
| #28 08:00am 20/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Hogfather
Posts: 1967
Location: Cairns, Queensland
|
ASCII camel toe?
|
|||||||
| #29 08:59am 20/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Raven
Posts: 2949
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
|
jim: it's not supposed to be a serious reply
raven: it's not supposed to be a serious chart Really? Then why do so many programmers seem to actually follow it? :) |
|||||||
| #30 09:21am 20/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Jim
Posts: 8366
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
raven: g'day
|
|||||||
| #31 10:43am 20/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
Opec
Posts: 5209
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
LOL Ruby programmers...
|
|||||||
| #32 11:50am 20/08/08 |
|
|||||||
|
system
|
--
|
|||||||
| #32 |
|
|||||||
|
| ||||||||