Hey it's the guy who utterly embarrassed himself earlier in this thread with his 'compelling 9/11 evidence' who also claimed the States 'provoked' Pearl Harbour.

How's it going?

never said it was compelling, so i don't know why you 'quoted me'

and i didn't say the states provoked it, the japanese generals in charge of the country in those days said that provocation was the motive for pearl harbour.

still, u didn't answer any of the last post about the fist

Well those generals were pretty obviously full of s*** weren't they. You seemed to agree with them though. And sorry the quotation marks were sort of meant to denote sarcasm. You seem to believe 9/11 was committed by the US government. Usually to believe something (well for normal people at least) as extreme in nature as that requires compelling evidence.

Oh and yeah no fists up the arse for me when I was younger.

try positioning yourself from a different point of view

its 1941, sun is shining, birds are singing, japan is raping the s*** out of china and korea.

now what would cause their military to make a decision to attack america.. you know, a reason. or they just felt like they could take on the biggest industrial nation in the world whilst conquering china and south east asia for s***s and giggles.



for a bit of context

fpot has 15000+ posts on qgl forum... its documented fact. he wouldn't dispute that

if some knownothingknowitall turns around in 50 years time and says 'there is no way fpot could possibly post that much thats just retarded he would've had to of been sitting at his computer non stop for 10 years waiting for a chance to post just utter s*** 99% of the time to get that many posts, its impossible'

yet the history books clearly state that yes he did indeed post an unhuman amount... does the knowitall just rewrite history to suit their obvious real interpretation and call everyone else a wanker/idiot/f***head/c***face, or is the knowitall just an idiot ?

You could look a bit deeper at the numbers. 17348 posts in 10 years = 4.75 posts a day. One post would take, what, two minutes to type on average? That's 10 minutes a day posting. An utterly inhuman (lol un) amount!

In 1941 there was a little event going on called WW2. Pearl Harbour was motivated by the the US cutting off Japan's resources I don't dispute that. What seems strange from you though is that you want to paint the US exclusively as the bad guys here. The US were desperate to stay neutral in WW2, but were forced into it by the Japanese attack. The Japanese were performing some evil s*** as well during WW2 that was close to if not as bad as some of the acts the Nazis were performing.

I am guessing by your lack of posting about 9/11 you've actually come around to the fact that maybe the US didn't commit those acts. Good for you.

last edited by fpot at 23:36:36 20/Mar/10

Shutup f*****.

in before the lock.

The Japs in WW2 were a******s, even if the American leadership prompted the attack, so the f*** what? The Japanese needed a good asskicking.

Pearl Harbour was motivated by the the US cutting off Japan's resources I don't dispute that. What seems strange from you though is that you want to paint the US exclusively as the bad guys here. The US were desperate to stay neutral in WW2

so now you've gone from disagreeing to agreeing with the japanese motive. they were not desperate to stay neutral in a broad sense. the people were, the government, the banks most definitely were not. is it impossible for you to draw the link between the us govt being in debt = power for the private federal reserve ? is there not a single entity in modern history that has benefited exclusively from nations being at war regardless of what they are/were ?

The Japs in WW2 were a******s, even if the American leadership prompted the attack, so the f*** what? The Japanese needed a good asskicking.

although its a thread sidetrack
maybe so, but you are doing what the media do, tarring an entire nation with the brush to suit the day. if the japs were a******s, what do you call the righteous nation who won the pacific war nuking 2 totally unmilitarised cities with nothing but civilians inhabiting them ?

go visit hiroshima and say so the f*** what. they are both as bad as each other.

If the Americans did not Nuke those two cities, the only other option was to invade. That would have killed far more Allied soldiers and Japanese soldiers and civilians than the two nukes. Would you prefer that?

by that logic we should've just nuked vietnam. why not theyre all only gooks anyway aren't they. gooks bad whitey good ?

edit: just thinking about that tired excuse makes me angry. there is no reason the yanks couldn't of demonstrated the power to the japanese leadership at the time without killing women and children. the only reason they did it is because the nuclear option was competing with the firebombing option against tokyo which incidentally killed more CIVILIANS in 1 night then the nukes did... not to mention the chemical warfare option that was also on the table which once again was designed to kill as many CIVILIANS as possible.

did they also have to firebomb dresden because otherwise those women and children would've stood a fighting chance and more would've died ?

how about the US imposed sanctions against iraq that killed more then a million ?

if anyone its the yanks who are the ultimate c***s and they still are today. but its ok coz we're allied with them

last edited by cainer at 02:10:36 21/Mar/10

Vietnam did not occupy several countries and kill MILLIONS of people.

Vietnam did not occupy several countries and kill MILLIONS of people.

yeah they were having a civil war with nothing to do with america, and here they came, trundling along, bombing the absolute s*** out of it. killing 2 million people for what ? something the people wanted anyway.

your train of logic suggests america should've involved itself in rwanda then ? they are the ultimate good at the end of the day arent they.

fpot is of the opinion that the yanks were desperate to stay neutral, you are of the opinion that the yanks are only fighting for the good all the time.

so what is it, a reason or a good excuse at the time.

coz the yanks could not give a flying f*** in 1930 when the japs first invaded china, annexed korea in 1910, fought the russians in 1890.

I never said anything about the yanks being the good guys. You're just an idiot, ignoring points made by me and fpot and anyone else stupid enough to waste their time on you.

Vietnam was in a different era, done by a completely different government in a different set of conditions (zomg save the world from communists). It is completely irrelevant to the point you originally made about america baiting japan to declare war/killing it's own citizens in 9/11.

You still haven't provided any evidence on that btw, don't even bother replying with more of your irrelevant and often completely wrong rants.

re: 9/11

pennsylvania crash site looks nothing at all like the dozens and dozens of airplane crash sites before it... hows that for a start. nothing is intact, no wings, landing gear, wheres the engines. i note fpot posted a pic of the fuselage about 1m x 1m next to some grass.... ok.

wtc7 collapsing, implosion style, not toppling. twin towers collapsing, implosion style, not toppling.



if you want to understand why there are skeptics, look at the timeline for every major war the yanks have been involved in and its a common theme. 9/11 is the obvious one for the 'wur on turrur'.

once again, ultimately, who benefits at the end of the day ? is it the iraqis ? afghans ? american people ? you ? me ? soldiers ?

answer that one

and if you can figure it out you'll find the source of all the skeptics' evil. here's a hint, they engineered the GFC. (you know the event that transferred all that private debt (trillions $) to the public) coz they were too big to fail

last edited by cainer at 02:38:24 21/Mar/10

America wasnt sitting on the sidelines in WW2. They were actively encouraging the countries that surrounded the Commies. Americas enemy was always the Commies.
As long as the Commies didnt take over Europe all was well.
They helped hitler until he signed the peace treaty with Russia. 2 days later it was War on Hitler.

They didnt care about the Japs running around raping China just as long as the Commies didnt take over China. Japan and Russia signed a peace deal in 1941.
It was later that year that America loaded up Pearl Harbour and waited for Japan to attack. They knew where the Japs were. It was like placing a warm pie on the window sill.
A Honey Trap.

If you look at World War 2 as the War to stop Communism you will see a very different kind of History then what has been told by Hollywood.
You might even look a little deeper at what happened AFTER World War 2 to see that America or ? was quite correct in their predictions.

Even as the Nazis were being pushed back towards the end of the War there was discussions taking place between the Allies and German Generals about Germany allying with the Allies and pushing Russia back to Moscow.
Hitlers mistake was to sign a Peace treaty with Russia.
Japans mistake was to sign a peace treaty with Russia.

The Pennsylvania crash was kind of unique in that the plane impacted nose first into the ground at high speed. Most plane crashes happen with the plane skidding along the ground which causes the classic looking plane crash site that you are used to seeing.

All the other stuff is years old s*** that has been debunked, along with 'whoa man the US benefited from it... it must be them!'. You're retarded.

I am not about to get into a debate over the nuking of Japan with you. You are simply not worth debating anything with, it's only worth it telling you when you are just simply wrong, which is pretty much all of the time.

How does it feel to have thoughts that align with someone as obviously off his tree like Faceman though? I'd be s***ting myself if I thought the same way he did... heh

Pilots for 9/11 Truth has reported that the data stream from the flight data recorder (FDR) for American Airlines flight 77, which allegedly struck the Pentagon on 9/11, shows that the cockpit door never opened during the entire 90 minute flight. The data was provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which has refused to comment. [...] This new evidence, showing that the cockpit door never opened during flight, is another nail in the coffin of the official story about flight 77. Clearly, if the cockpit door never opened, then hijackers did not storm the cockpit and herd the pilots to the back of the plane. The data, which originated from the government, does not support the government’s story."

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/american_77_hijack_impossible.html

So how did the hijackers control the plane ? Telepathy ?

Wait, I thought a missile hit the pentagon? So many stories! I don't know what's true!!!

GOOGLE: Trying very hard not to be evil.



The US Presidents entourage

TEH GOOGLEZ ARE STAELING YOUR DNA JUST LIKE DARTH VADER!?@#!?

edit: i don't get it, where's the world ending, puppy-murdering, child-abusing conspiracy in the hungry beast on obama's entourage?

last edited by taggs at 08:08:41 23/Mar/10

TEH GOOGLEZ ARE STAELING YOUR DNA JUST LIKE DARTH VADER!?@#!?

edit: i don't get it, where's the world ending, puppy-murdering, child-abusing conspiracy in the hungry beast on obama's entourage?last edited by taggs at 08:08:41 23/Mar/10

HHHuuuhhh?